September 26, 2026: Meta dominates today’s smart-glasses brief through two connected scrutiny stories. Mark Zuckerberg largely dismissed criticism of alleged “pervert glasses” use by pointing to how few people engage in the cited behavior with Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Separately, Engadget examined controls connected to Meta training AI models on visual data captured by the glasses, including whether workers can review photos and videos.
Meta Faces Scrutiny Over Use and Privacy
The first story is about criticism aimed at Ray-Ban Meta glasses and the characterization of them as “pervert glasses.” That wording belongs to the criticism and headline, not to an established product description. Zuckerberg’s response largely downplayed the claims, emphasizing the limited number of people he said were engaging in the cited “perverted” behavior.
That response addresses how widespread the behavior may be, but it does not erase the underlying question of how camera-equipped glasses are used in public or around other people. The supplied report does not establish that the criticism was disproved. It records Zuckerberg’s argument about the scale of the behavior.
Engadget’s separate report turns to a more direct control question: what happens to photos and videos captured through the glasses when Meta’s AI systems are involved? The settings guidance concerns whether Meta can use that visual data for AI-model training and whether workers can review the photos and videos.
Those are related concerns, but they are not the same story. One centers on user behavior and the social discomfort surrounding camera glasses. The other centers on data handling and the choices available in settings. Disabling the relevant option should be understood as a control over the described training and review practices, not as a guarantee of complete privacy.
Source: Mark Zuckerberg Downplays Ray-Ban Meta’s “Pervert Glasses” Criticism
Why These Stories Matter in the Buying Conversation
Meta remains the mainstream reference point in the supplied coverage, which gives even narrow updates about Ray-Ban Meta products wider practical relevance. A buyer is not evaluating only the frame design or the headline feature list. The conversation also includes how the glasses are used, how their camera changes interactions with other people, and how the company handles the visual information they capture.
Reviews, prescription models, and feature changes all affect that practical conversation. So do settings that determine whether visual data may be used for AI training or reviewed by workers. The available evidence does not provide a complete privacy assessment, but it does identify the questions a prospective owner may want to examine before choosing a model.
That context also helps separate two kinds of product appeal. Ray-Ban Meta glasses are discussed here as camera-equipped, AI-oriented glasses whose usefulness depends partly on everyday social acceptance and data controls. Other products in the category may emphasize displays, spatial recognition, or a more complete augmented-reality experience. The categories overlap, but they do not represent identical buying decisions.
Source: How To Stop Meta Training Its AI Models On Your Smart Glasses' Visual Data
Cellid and Megane Top Push Further Into AR
A separate announcement places the focus on the broader AR-glasses business. Cellid, described in the supplied material as a developer of displays and spatial-recognition engines for next-generation augmented-reality glasses, announced a partnership with Megane Top to commercialize and expand that business.
The announcement is an indication of planned cooperation, not evidence of demonstrated commercialization success. The source packet provides only a partial summary, so the significance here is limited: it adds another named partnership to an industry that includes several different kinds of glasses and several different technical goals.
That distinction matters. AI camera glasses can prioritize cameras, voice interaction, and software assistance. Wearable displays can focus on placing a screen in front of the wearer. Full AR products may combine display technology with spatial recognition to connect digital content with the surrounding environment. The Cellid item belongs to the AR side of that split, while the Meta stories concern camera glasses and their use.
For readers comparing products, the partnership is best treated as a signal to watch rather than a reason to change a purchase immediately. The supplied information does not provide a product launch date, pricing, specifications, or evidence that a finished consumer product has reached the market.
Source: Cellid and Megane Top Partner to Commercialize and Expand the AR Glasses Business
Continue Reading
For more buying context, these guides cover the category’s major product types and comparisons.
